ArticleSAGE open nursing
Building a Virtual Community of Practice for Family and Friend Caregivers of People Living With Dementia: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Over 55 million people worldwide live with dementia, placing significant demands on family and friend caregivers. These demands lead to stress, depression, and social isolation. Caregivers report unmet needs such as access to resources, education, and emotional support. A Virtual Community of Practice (VCoP) offers a promising solution by fostering shared learning, emotional support, and practical caregiving strategies. Objectives: This study explored the (a) perceptions of caregivers and a person living with dementia of the VCoP (b) recommendations of caregivers and a person living with dementia to improve the VCoP and (c) experiences of caregivers and a person living with dementia in co-designing the VCoP. Methods: Using a mixed-method sequential explanatory approach, ten research partners (nine caregivers and one person with dementia) participated in two virtual workshops and follow-up interviews. Survey data were collected via the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Patient and Public Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis of workshop and interview data was conducted. Results: The VCoP achieved an SUS score of 94.5, indicating excellent usability. PPEET results showed high satisfaction with engagement in development. A total of eight themes were developed. Thematic analysis highlighted strengths such as ease of locating information on the website, practical content, and opportunities for sharing and learning through discussion forums. Recommendations included improving accessibility, tailoring activities to life stories, and ensuring activities maintain normalcy. Research partners felt included and supported during the workshops, enjoyed the small group atmosphere, and appreciated seeing their ideas reflected in the final product. Conclusions: The VCoP was perceived as practical for supporting caregivers. Involving people with lived experience ensured the intervention met caregiver needs. Findings underscore the importance of VCoPs and the value of co-design in creating effective caregiver support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.