Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500475›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

The limits of sustainability of peat as a soilless media for agriculture.

James Altland, Bruce Bugbee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James AltlandApplication Technology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Wooster, OH, United States.
Bruce BugbeeCrop Physiology Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soilless media has long been used to improve fertilizer and water use efficiency of high-value crops in containers, and global demand for these media is predicted to increase 250% to 400% in the next 25 years. The environmental impact of all soilless media products warrants detailed analysis. The unique properties of peat make it the most widely used product. Peatlands are vital carbon stores and the historical degradation of European bogs has prompted regulations restricting peat extraction. Unlike Europe, North American peatlands-particularly in Canada-are largely pristine and have the potential to be sustainably managed. A focus on restoration, coupled with limited human interaction in remote peatlands, means that Canadian peatlands are currently accumulating carbon faster than the rate of extraction for containerized crop production. However, the steadily increasing use of soilless media for high-input agriculture may drive-up international demand for North American peat, requiring careful management to maintain sustainability. Several alternative products have been studied but our review of seven life cycle assessments reveals that their environmental impact is similar to or greater than peat. The expansion of high-input agriculture means that multiple soilless media components will be needed to feed our growing population.

Indexed as

carbon footprintglobal warming potentialgrowing mediahorticulturepeatlandrestoration

Identifiers

PMID42500475
PMCPMC13398049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.