ArticleIntegrative medicine research2026
Quantifying the therapeutic index of acupoints using measurements of effective and hazardous depths.
Article in Integrative medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond points: conceptual challenges in anatomy-based mapping of acupoints.Integrative medicine research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture needles are widely used to treat various medical conditions, but can occasionally lead to serious adverse events. The therapeutic index (TI), originally developed in pharmacology to quantify the safety margin between effective and toxic doses, provides a valuable potential framework for evaluating anatomical safety in acupuncture. Methods: We applied the TI concept to two commonly used acupoints-GB21 and ST36-by quantifying the TI value, defined as the ratio of the median hazardous depth (HD₅₀) to the median effective depth (ED₅₀), based on ultrasound-guided measurement and Results: GB21 demonstrated a TI of 1.54, indicating a relatively wide safety margin, whereas ST36 had a TI of 1.09, reflecting a narrow and potentially risk-prone margin. Conclusions: These findings emphasize the impact of anatomical variability and highlight the need for personalized depth control in acupuncture practice. Our study provides preliminary evidence that integrating the TI concept into acupuncture safety assessment may support more individualized, data-driven needling strategies. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory and require confirmation in larger, demographically diverse populations and at additional acupoints before being generalized to routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.