ArticleIntegrative medicine research2026
Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines and technical operation norms in acupuncture and moxibustion: Evaluation using AGREE II and STAR.
Article in Integrative medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The methodological quality of current acupuncture and moxibustion clinical practice guidelines and technical operation norms remain unclear. Given their potential impact on clinical decision-making and health policy, this study aimed to evaluate their quality using the AGREE II and STAR tools, and to explore the need for a tailored appraisal tool for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) technical operation norms. Methods: A methodological evaluation was conducted using standardized appraisal instruments. A systematic search across 14 databases identified guidelines and norms related to acupuncture and moxibustion published up to December 31, 2025. Two independent reviewers assessed the included documents using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and Scientific, Transparent, Applicable Rating (STAR) tools. Results: Seventy-six publications were included: 31 clinical practice guidelines and 45 technical operation norms. AGREE II results showed that 29 guidelines scored >50% in 4 out of 6 domains, while 7 norms met the criterion. STAR evaluation showed an overall score of 64.4% for guidelines versus 15.3% for norms. Conclusions: This study found that acupuncture and moxibustion clinical practice guidelines generally demonstrate moderate methodological quality, whereas technical operation norms consistently show low scores across multiple domains, indicating substantial room for improvement. These findings also suggest that commonly used appraisal tools, such as AGREE II and STAR, may not fully capture the unique characteristics of TCM technical documents. Future work should develop TCM-specific appraisal tools and improve implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.