ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
An Evaluation of the Use of Fibrinolytic Therapy for Treatment of STEMI in Northern New England Over Two Decades.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sixteen Years After TRANSFER-AMI, Rural STEMI In-hospital Outcomes Remain Unchanged: Confronting the Pharmacoinvasive Paradox.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Geographic challenges complicate treatment of rural patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and many undergo a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy for optimal STEMI management. The PI population remains vastly understudied in contemporary interventional cardiology practice. This study sought to evaluate the changing comorbidities, clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and in-hospital outcomes over a twenty-year period between the premodern era (2001-2012) and the modern era (2013-2020) of patients who underwent a PI strategy for STEMI. Methods: All patients presenting with a STEMI and treated with a PI strategy within the Dartmouth-Health regional STEMI network over a 20-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified to the premodern era (2000-2012) or the modern era (2013-2020), and patient-level data were compared between eras. Two coprimary outcomes of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (death, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke) and bleeding complications were compared between eras. Results: Despite an increase in the global burden of cardiovascular comorbidities over the past 2 decades, comorbidities remained constant in this patient population over time. In contrast with the observed temporal improvements in STEMI outcomes in urban populations, adjusted in-hospital MACE (7.2% vs 6.9%, Conclusions: In a large cohort of rural STEMI patients treated with a PI strategy over the past 20 years, care delivery metrics improved, while in-hospital outcomes remained largely unchanged over time. This presents a target for future strategies to improve cardiovascular care in rural patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.