ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Radial Access Strategies: Focus on Coronary Function Testing for Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.
Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive coronary function testing (CFT) allows comprehensive assessment of the mechanisms of angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries, which can include coronary microvascular dysfunction, coronary vasospasm, endothelial dysfunction, or myocardial bridging. There is significant heterogeneity in approaches to CFT, including in the selection of arterial access site for the procedure. Transradial arterial access is associated with less bleeding and fewer vascular complications, but can be challenging in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary arteries, as they are disproportionately of female sex, with higher risks of radial spasm and crossover. Radial vasodilators for radial spasm prophylaxis may lower the diagnostic yield of CFT. In this review, we highlight strategies to ensure diagnostic fidelity while enabling radial-first CFT, including conscious sedation, left radial arterial access, atraumatic wire advancement, pressure-mediated vasodilation using a saline "mocktail," selective use of short-acting arterial vasodilators when needed, mother-and-daughter catheter advancement, balloon-assisted tracking techniques, and the use of long hydrophilic sheaths. A pragmatic approach to radial vasodilators is reasonable when CFT is performed ad hoc, whereas withholding prophylactic radial vasodilators is preferred in patients electively referred for definitive CFT. Although the access site should be selected based on anatomic considerations and patient preference, a cocktail-free radial-first strategy is feasible for most patients undergoing CFT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.