ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Oculomotor markers of functional impairment in traumatic brain injury using simple and predictive visual tracking.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oculomotor function is a sensitive marker of neurological impairment, and smooth pursuit deficits have been reported across multiple neurological disorders. However, the oculomotor deficits following traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain incompletely characterized, particularly in relation to current functional status during rehabilitation. Methods: In this study, we employed a bedside, head-free eye-tracking paradigm based on short, repeated linear tracking segments, to assess oculomotor dysfunction in 30 TBI patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and 30 age-matched controls. This design enabled the extraction of multiple complementary oculomotor indices, including saccadic pursuit (catch-up saccade contribution), tracking deviation under occlusion, initial tracking speed, initial catch-up saccade latency, pupil response, and vergence instability. Results: TBI patients exhibited widespread deficits across these indices compared with controls (AUC = 0.71-0.84). These measures also correlated significantly with functional status as indexed by the Functional Independence Measure (R = 0.39-0.77, p < 0.001) but, importantly, showed no association with initial injury severity as indexed by the Glasgow Coma Scale. Conclusion: These findings indicate that TBI disrupts multiple components of the oculomotor system, extending beyond basic pursuit gain to predictive tracking, pupil-linked arousal, and binocular coordination. The dissociation between functional status and initial acute injury severity highlights the sensitivity of oculomotor measures to current brain function during rehabilitation. Together, these results support the use of brief, clinic-friendly eye-tracking assessments as a quantitative approach for evaluating current functional status in TBI, with potential future applications for longitudinal monitoring pending further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.