ReviewFuture healthcare journal2026
Criteria and enabling conditions for assessing cash-releasing interventions: An evidence review in the context of the NHS 'three shifts'.
Review in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The NHS faces unprecedented financial pressure, requiring the identification of cash-releasing interventions (CRIs). To support evaluation of this, we established five criteria based on relevant frameworks. We conducted an evidence review of published and grey literature (2019-2025), identifying and evaluating CRIs aligned with NHS England's 'three shifts'. 186 papers (filtered from 5,175 papers through eight stages) and 151 grey literature documents were assessed against the criteria. No sources contained enough information to determine whether they were cash releasing. There were 332 interventions with potential across community (n = 88), digital (n = 123) and prevention (n = 121), with most requiring 1-5-year implementation. Conditions that would enable cash release were identified. Numerous interventions improved the way that the NHS uses resources. It suggests that the NHS can improve population health and financial sustainability by reallocating resources into higher-value and more cost-effective interventions. Cash release should therefore be a means to improve value for populations, rather an objective itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.