Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500378›Full record

ReviewFuture healthcare journal2026

Criteria and enabling conditions for assessing cash-releasing interventions: An evidence review in the context of the NHS 'three shifts'.

Freddie Finlay, Wayne Smith, Tim Shaw, Oliver Carey, Akkshata Ahire, Amardeep Rai, Nigel Edwards, Gwyn Bevan, Charles Tallack, Andi Orlowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Freddie FinlayHealth Economics Unit, London, UK.
Wayne SmithHealth Economics Unit, London, UK.
Tim ShawHealth Economics Unit, London, UK.
Oliver CareyHealth Economics Unit, London, UK.
Akkshata AhireHealth Economics Unit, London, UK.
Amardeep RaiHealth Economics Unit, London, UK.
Nigel EdwardsPPL, London, UK.
Gwyn BevanLondon School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Charles TallackThe Health Foundation, London, UK.
Andi OrlowskiHealth Economics Unit, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NHS faces unprecedented financial pressure, requiring the identification of cash-releasing interventions (CRIs). To support evaluation of this, we established five criteria based on relevant frameworks. We conducted an evidence review of published and grey literature (2019-2025), identifying and evaluating CRIs aligned with NHS England's 'three shifts'. 186 papers (filtered from 5,175 papers through eight stages) and 151 grey literature documents were assessed against the criteria. No sources contained enough information to determine whether they were cash releasing. There were 332 interventions with potential across community (n = 88), digital (n = 123) and prevention (n = 121), with most requiring 1-5-year implementation. Conditions that would enable cash release were identified. Numerous interventions improved the way that the NHS uses resources. It suggests that the NHS can improve population health and financial sustainability by reallocating resources into higher-value and more cost-effective interventions. Cash release should therefore be a means to improve value for populations, rather an objective itself.

Indexed as

Cash releasing interventionsCommunity careCost improvement programmesDigital healthHealth economicsNHS efficiencyPrevention

Identifiers

PMID42500378
PMCPMC13396852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.