ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
The Proposed Clustering Model to Predict Autism Spectrum Disorder in Toddlers.
Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To introduce a robust clustering model for the early prediction of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in toddlers. Methods: Five parametric and five non-parametric clustering algorithms were employed using all available features of a dataset obtained from Kaggle.com. The performance of these algorithms was evaluated through a comparative analysis based on several metrics, including the Silhouette Score (SS), Davies-Bouldin Index (DBI), adjusted rand index (ARI), Fowlkes-Mallows index (FMI), normalized mutual information (NMI), standard deviation (SD), and processing time (PT). Results: The results demonstrate that the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) achieved superior performance compared with the other algorithms on this dataset. The best results were observed in terms of both clustering performance (SS = 0.1952, DBI = 1.8038, ARI = 0.9730, FMI = 0.9884, NMI = 0.9439) and time efficiency (an average of 4.1998 s over five runs) when training and testing were conducted on the entire dataset. When the dataset was split into training and testing sets, GMM achieved the following performance: SS = 0.2108, DBI = 1.6722, ARI = 1, FMI = 1, NMI = 1, and SD=0.0818. Conclusion: ASD is a long-term neurological condition that requires early, rapid, accurate, and effective diagnosis to ensure appropriate healthcare intervention. Traditional diagnostic methods are often time-consuming and costly. Consequently, machine learning approaches have emerged as faster and more cost-effective alternatives for ASD diagnosis. In this study, GMM showed superior performance among the algorithms compared within this dataset, but should not be interpreted as a diagnostic tool without further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.