ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Influencing factors and model predictive analysis of the efficacy of adjuvant ¹³¹I therapy after DTC surgery.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore influencing factors and construct predictive models for the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant ¹³¹I therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Methods: A total of 376 DTC patients who underwent total thyroidectomy and received initial adjuvant ¹³¹I therapy at a fixed activity of 100 mCi were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were divided into excellent response (ER) and non-excellent response (nER) groups according to the 2025 ATA evaluation criteria at the 6-month follow-up. Relevant statistical methods and multivariate binary logistic regression were adopted to screen independent influencing factors. ROC curve analysis, support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) were applied to establish predictive models. Results: The incidence of nER was 48.40%. BMI, number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNM), stimulated thyroglobulin (s-Tg), BRAF mutation (BRAF) and mean residual ¹³¹I uptake count (C-mean) were independent risk factors (OR = 1.112, 1.061, 1.198, 3.041, 1.103, respectively), while maximum residual ¹³¹I uptake count (C-max) was an independent protective factor (OR = 0.995). The AUC of logistic regression model was 86.30%, and optimal cut-off values were determined as follows: BMI 29.345 kg/m², LNM 9.5 nodes, s-Tg 3.3 ng/ml, C-max 18.5 counts, and C-mean 38 counts. The AUC of SVM model was 86.33%, and the RF model showed the optimal predictive performance with an AUC of 90.77%. S-Tg, LNM and BMI were the top three important predictors. Patients with concurrent high s-Tg, multiple metastatic lymph nodes and elevated BMI had a 100% risk of nER. Conclusion: A considerable proportion of DTC patients fail to achieve ER after 100 mCi adjuvant ¹³¹I therapy. BMI, LNM, s-Tg, BRAF and C-mean are independent risk factors for nER, while C-max are independent protective factors against nER. The RF model possesses excellent predictive ability for adjuvant ¹³¹I treatment response. The coexistence of s-Tg ≥ 3.3 ng/ml, LNM ≥ 9.5 nodes, and BMI ≥ 29.345 kg/m² indicates an extremely high risk of nER, which offers evidence-based support for the judicious escalation of ¹³¹I activity in selected patients undergoing adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.