ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Development and internal validation of a radiomics-clinical combined model for predicting axillary pathological complete response in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prediction of axillary pathological complete response (apCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients may guide surgical de-escalation from axillary lymph node dissection to sentinel lymph node biopsy. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a combined radiomics-clinical prediction model for apCR. Methods: This single-center retrospective study enrolled 386 cN+ breast cancer patients (training, n = 270; validation, n = 116). Pre-NAC DCE-MRI radiomic features were extracted from primary tumors. LASSO regression selected eight features for Rad-score construction. Clinical predictors were identified via logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, calibration metrics, and decision curve analysis. Results: The overall apCR rate was 43.5% (168/386). The combined model (tumor size, HER2 status, Ki-67, breast clinical complete response, and Rad-score) achieved a validation AUC of 0.703 (95% CI, 0.610-0.792). It significantly outperformed the radiomics-only model (ΔAUC = 0.094, P = 0.004) but not the clinical-only model (ΔAUC = 0.020, P = 0.713). The combined model showed a calibration slope of 0.811 and an intercept of 0.018, indicating moderate overfitting. Risk stratification showed monotonic gradients across tertiles (low 18.8%, intermediate 48.0%, high 58.8%). After bootstrap bias correction, the optimism-corrected training AUC of the combined model was 0.742. Conclusions: The combined model demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability but did not add significant value over clinical predictors alone. The current misclassification rate precludes direct clinical application for surgical de-escalation. External multicenter validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.