Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500285›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Comparison of the diagnostic value of white light endoscopic, narrow band imaging, and iodine staining individually and in combination for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.

Xia Yin, Miao Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xia YinGastroenterology Department, Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Miao MengGastroenterology Department, Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of white light endoscopic (WLE), narrow band imaging (NBI), and iodine staining, both individually and in combination, for the detection of early esophageal cancer (EC) and precancerous lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 55 patients with suspected early EC or precancerous lesions who were treated at Wuxi Second People's Hospital between January 2022 and June 2023. All patients underwent simultaneous endoscopic examination using WLI, NBI, and iodine staining. A total of 63 lesions were identified. Surgical histopathological results and/or follow-up confirmation served as the gold standard. The diagnostic performance (including accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value) of each method individually and in combination was observed and compared. Results: Among the 63 suspected lesions, 5 cases of early EC and 37 cases of precancerous lesions were confirmed by histopathology or follow-up. The combined diagnostic and iodine staining approach demonstrated significantly higher accuracy and sensitivity for early EC compared to WLI or NBI alone ( Conclusion: Both endoscopic NBI and iodine staining exhibit relatively high clinical detection rates for early EC and precancerous lesions. Their combined use can further enhance the detection rate of these conditions.

Indexed as

early esophageal canceriodine stainingnarrow band imagingprecancerous lesionswhite light endoscopic

Identifiers

PMID42500285
PMCPMC13395732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.