ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Production and characterization of mechanically-enzymatically treated suspensions of the food by-product pea hull.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the potential health benefits of dietary fiber, incorporating high-fiber by-products such as pea hulls into food products is both sustainable and desirable. However, incorporation into semi-solid or low viscous food products can be challenging due to limited fiber functionality, which is partly attributable to its low solubility. Here, a combined mechanical-enzymatic treatment of pea hulls was performed with the aim of obtaining low viscous, physically stable, oligosaccharide-rich fiber suspensions. The pea hull consisted mainly of cellulose next to (glucurono)xylans, pectic polysaccharides, especially linear arabinans and unesterified homogalacturonans, and xyloglucans. Mechanical-enzymatic treatment of pea hulls was performed using microfluidization (1,750 bar, 3 or 5 runs), and commercial arabinanase and cellulase (50 °C, 30 min) were used for the enzymatic treatment. The chemical-structural and the technofunctional properties of the treated pea hulls were determined. Both mechanically-enzymatically treated pea hulls showed comparable fiber contents (73%-75%) as well as polysaccharide composition and structures. Both treatments resulted in a reduction in particle size, though with different particle size distributions, and improved functional properties of pea hull suspensions. High mechanical intensity was crucial for physical stability of the suspensions and enzymes for partial degradation of polysaccharides. Contrary to our expectations, this was not accompanied by extensive solubilization of insoluble cell wall polysaccharides, which is likely due to the high proportion of crystalline cellulose. Nevertheless, the treated pea hulls showed an improved hydration capacity, and limited amounts of potentially prebiotic di- and oligosaccharides were also released. Overall, the treatments resulted in high-fiber ingredients with small particle sizes (D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.