Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500246›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Production and characterization of mechanically-enzymatically treated suspensions of the food by-product pea hull.

Rebekka Elke Schmidt, Veronika Kurz, Verena Haitz, Rocío Morales-Medina, Jan Steffan, Judith Keller, Stephan Drusch, Mirko Bunzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebekka Elke SchmidtDepartment of Food Chemistry and Phytochemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Veronika KurzDepartment of Food Chemistry and Phytochemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Verena HaitzDepartment of Food Chemistry and Phytochemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Rocío Morales-MedinaDepartment of Food Technology and Food Material Science, Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin (TUB), Berlin, Germany.
Jan SteffanDepartment of Food Chemistry and Phytochemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Judith KellerDepartment of Food Chemistry and Phytochemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Stephan DruschDepartment of Food Technology and Food Material Science, Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin (TUB), Berlin, Germany.
Mirko BunzelDepartment of Food Chemistry and Phytochemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the potential health benefits of dietary fiber, incorporating high-fiber by-products such as pea hulls into food products is both sustainable and desirable. However, incorporation into semi-solid or low viscous food products can be challenging due to limited fiber functionality, which is partly attributable to its low solubility. Here, a combined mechanical-enzymatic treatment of pea hulls was performed with the aim of obtaining low viscous, physically stable, oligosaccharide-rich fiber suspensions. The pea hull consisted mainly of cellulose next to (glucurono)xylans, pectic polysaccharides, especially linear arabinans and unesterified homogalacturonans, and xyloglucans. Mechanical-enzymatic treatment of pea hulls was performed using microfluidization (1,750 bar, 3 or 5 runs), and commercial arabinanase and cellulase (50 °C, 30 min) were used for the enzymatic treatment. The chemical-structural and the technofunctional properties of the treated pea hulls were determined. Both mechanically-enzymatically treated pea hulls showed comparable fiber contents (73%-75%) as well as polysaccharide composition and structures. Both treatments resulted in a reduction in particle size, though with different particle size distributions, and improved functional properties of pea hull suspensions. High mechanical intensity was crucial for physical stability of the suspensions and enzymes for partial degradation of polysaccharides. Contrary to our expectations, this was not accompanied by extensive solubilization of insoluble cell wall polysaccharides, which is likely due to the high proportion of crystalline cellulose. Nevertheless, the treated pea hulls showed an improved hydration capacity, and limited amounts of potentially prebiotic di- and oligosaccharides were also released. Overall, the treatments resulted in high-fiber ingredients with small particle sizes (D

Indexed as

cell wall polysaccharidesdietary fiberdynamic high-pressure microfluidizationenzymatic hydrolysisfood by-productupcycling

Identifiers

PMID42500246
PMCPMC13398759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.