ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
The social production of the food environment: a mixed-methods analysis of the unequal distribution of capitals and competencies in a Latin American metropolis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Food-environment models often privilege structural determinants and under-specify how eating practices and agency participate in (re)producing environments. This study analyzes, through a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, how social eating practices are shaped by food environments and, in turn, contribute to their differential configuration across two districts of contrasting socioeconomic status. It proposes a theoretical framework that articulates Bourdieu's praxeology with Shove's theory of practices, conceptualizing food environments as social fields in which capitals are contested, and meanings, materials, and competencies are stabilized. Methods: Through a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, the NEMS-P-Ch survey was administered to 785 adults, and eleven focus groups were conducted in two districts of contrasting socioeconomic status (SES) within a major Latin American metropolis. Results: In low-SES districts, provisioning practices center on farmers' markets and local shops, mobilizing social capital and budget-maximizing strategies to navigate material scarcity. Conversely, high-SES practices are dominated by supermarkets and digital platforms, guided by time efficiency and taste as markers of distinction. Discussion: The food environment is both a producer and a product of daily practices, which configure differentiated infrastructures based on the agents' trajectories and available capitals. Public policies must move beyond isolated individual and structural approaches, integrating the complexity of social practices to effectively address the persistent structural inequalities of urban food systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.