ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Exploring the use, benefits, and challenges of nutrition applications among clinical nutrition specialists in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Technological advancements in Saudi Arabia have influenced healthcare delivery, including clinical nutrition practice. This study examined the impact of digital nutrition tools on clinical dietitians' work, focusing on perceived benefits, challenges, and experiences with technology integration. Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through a self-developed online survey of senior clinical nutrition students, interns, and practicing clinical dietitians ( Results: Survey participants were predominantly female, Saudi nationals with bachelor's degrees in clinical nutrition and 1 to 5 years of professional experience. Respondents generally agreed on the usefulness of digital tools; however, perceived barriers differed significantly by educational level ( Conclusions: Digital nutrition tools can facilitate aspects of clinical practice, including workflow and patient care. However, balanced use is important to maintain professional competence and preserve critical manual skills, suggesting that technology should complement, rather than replace, core clinical expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.