SynthesisRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2026
Oteseconazole
Synthesis in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common infection traditionally treated with fluconazole. Oteseconazole is a new oral antifungal offering a promising alternative. However, it is essential to assess if it has better efficacy than the treatment already used in VVC. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for studies comparing oteseconazole and fluconazole in acute VVC. Three randomized controlled trials were included. Odds ratios were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: The initial search yielded 203 results, but only three RCTs with 593 patients were included. Oteseconazole showed significantly higher rates of therapeutic and sustained clinical cure at day 14 and 28 compared to fluconazole (OR 2.56 and 2.08, respectively), with similar rates of mild to moderate adverse events. Risk of bias was high due to selective reporting. Conclusion: Oteseconazole appears to be a safe and more effective alternative to fluconazole for acute VVC, but further research and more robust studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.