Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500173›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2026

Association of preterm birth and congenital anomalies: findings of a Brazilian multicenter study.

Marcelo Luis Nomura, Luiz Carlos Santos-Junior, Jose Paulo Siqueira Guida, Tabata Zumpano Santos, Giuliane Jesus Lajos, Rodolfo Carvalho Pacagnella, Patricia Moretti Rheder, Ricardo Porto Tedesco, Renato Teixeira Souza, Maria Laura Costa and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marcelo Luis NomuraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2664-4475
Luiz Carlos Santos-JuniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3404-3407
Jose Paulo Siqueira GuidaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-6159
Tabata Zumpano SantosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8072-2887
Giuliane Jesus LajosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-3303
Rodolfo Carvalho PacagnellaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-0009
Patricia Moretti RhederUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-1109
Ricardo Porto TedescoFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia JundiaíSP Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4851-6949
Renato Teixeira SouzaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-9269
Maria Laura CostaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-3234
Renato Passini-JuniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8247-4549
Jose Guilherme CecattiUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia Brazil Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-8445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the prevalence of congenital anomalies among women who had preterm births, their association with gestational age, characteristics of pregnancy termination and perinatal outcomes. Methods: A secondary analysis of the Brazilian Multicenter Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP), a multicenter cross-sectional study in 20 maternity hospitals, comparing cases of preterm birth with and without anomalies. A random sample of term births served as controls. The risk of malformations was estimated by maternal age, gestational age, type of onset of labour, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes using OR (95%CI) for categorical variables. Results: Among 4,150 preterm births and 1,146 selected term controls, congenital anomalies were found in 7.21% of cases (8.36% in preterm vs. 3.1% in term). Preterm birth increased the risk of anomalies by 2.89-fold (95% CI: 2.03-4.13). Cardiovascular anomalies were most common (19.1%), followed by central nervous system anomalies (18.8%) and abdominal wall defects (12.5%). The highest risk was observed at 28-31 weeks (OR 4.57, 95%CI 3.01-6.94). Elective cesarean delivery was more frequent among neonates with abnormalities (40.1% vs. 32.1%, OR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.13-1.77). Neonates with abnormalities had a higher risk of low 5 Conclusion: Prematurity is associated with congenital anomalies, leading to increased neonatal morbidity, mortality, and admission to NICU.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesPremature BirthAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrevalenceYoung AdultCongenital abnormalitiesGestational ageInfant mortalityInfant, newbornMaternal agePremature birthTerm birth

Identifiers

PMID42500173
PMCPMC13399365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.