Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42500119›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2026

Cognitive neurodynamics of affective disorders.

Luigi Manfredi, Xinpeng Liu, J Douglas Steele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luigi ManfrediDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Ninewells Medical School, University of Dundee, Level 7, Corridor L, Mailbox 1, Dundee, DD1 9SY UK.
Xinpeng LiuDivision of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY UK.
J Douglas SteeleDivision of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe and enduring psychiatric illnesses, including melancholia and bipolar illness, show prolonged deviations in motivation and mood yet lack a unifying account of their long-term dynamics. Solomon's opponent-process theory provides a qualitative framework for short-timescale affective responses, composed of a fast stimulus-locked a-process opposed by a slower adaptive b-process. Here we evaluated whether these dynamics can be implemented as a computational homeostatic controller, and whether distinct clinical trajectories emerge as canonical failure modes of the same system. We formulated a tractable control-systems model with feedforward a- and b-processes, and examined its behaviour across minute-scale and month-scale regimes. Under "healthy" parameters, the model reproduced classical opponent-process responses. Altering only opponent-process gain and decay generated a prolonged downward drift, matching the clinical timescale and asymmetry of melancholia. Reducing damping within the same controller produced an endogenous underdamped oscillation with long period and phase asymmetry characteristic of bipolar illness. Together, these proof-of-principle simulations suggest that severe severe affective illnesses may be expressed as distinct dynamical regimes of a single motivational homeostat. This framework generates testable predictions and may facilitate experimental quantification of opponent-process recovery, damping, and gain as mechanistic markers of severe affective illnesses. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-026-10507-2.

Indexed as

Affective disordersControl systemsHomeostasisMotivational dynamicsOpponent-process theoryPsychiatric illnesses

Identifiers

PMID42500119
PMCPMC13396088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.