ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Astrocyte epigenetics in development, aging, and neurodegeneration: a DNA methylation perspective.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, have long been associated with developmental programming, as well as aging and disease states. However, our understanding of cell-specific epigenomic landscapes remains limited, especially in the context of brain aging and neurodegeneration. In cases of late-onset brain disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, Parkinson's disease, and frontotemporal dementia, unraveling cell-specific epigenomic contributions is particularly necessary to better understand the molecular contributors to early disease states, which may help enhance diagnostic and therapeutic measures. While whole brain tissue and neuronal cell-type-specific methylomic contributions have been extensively studied, those of glia, including astrocytes, remain poorly elucidated. Given the key role of DNA methylation in guiding neurodevelopmental timing and gliogenic onset, it is likely that these modifications alter astrocyte functionality with age and disease. Here, we briefly review astrocyte development in the context of DNA methylation and highlight key instances where methylomic changes contribute to astrocyte maturation and functionality. We also point to evidence showing extensive transcriptomic and functional changes associated with aged and diseased astrocytes and explore the relevance of DNA methylation in these conditions. Ultimately, elucidating molecular drivers of disease states in astrocytes will allow for a better understanding of cell-specific contributions and pave the way for future research directed at cell-specific therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.