ArticleLandscape ecology2026
Mechanisms of animal distribution: bridging advances in movement analysis with hierarchical and optimal foraging theories.
Article in Landscape ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Linking individual movements to population-level distributions remains a central challenge in ecology. Animal distributions arise from interdependent movement decisions across spatiotemporal scales. However, most studies focus on a single scale or treat them in isolation, constraining our ability to uncover the mechanisms shaping landscape-level patterns. Objectives: We evaluated whether hierarchical foraging decisions operating across nested scales can be recovered from movement data alone. Specifically, we tested whether multi-state step-selection functions (HMM-SSFs) can identify scale-dependent behavioural organization arising from mechanistic decision rules. Methods: We developed a model in which agents exploit resource sites grouped into camps within home ranges. Movement decisions were governed by energetic gains and the costs of travel, missed opportunities, and predation risk. We fitted HMM-SSFs to simulated movements to infer behavioural states and transitions. Results: HMM-SSFs accurately identified latent behavioural states corresponding to within-site resource exploitation, within-camp movements, and between-camp relocations. Transitions among states responded to spatial variation in resources and risk. States emerged from model inference without being imposed a priori. The recovered behavioural hierarchy aligned with predictions from foraging theory. These results demonstrate that hierarchical decision-making leaves identifiable signatures in movement trajectories. Conclusions: We demonstrate that multiscale processes can be inferred from movement data within a unified framework. Although results may be noisier for field observations than for simulations, complementary field methods can help mitigate this limitation by informing both the analysis and its interpretation. This approach therefore provides a valuable foundation for linking behaviour across scales in dynamic environments. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-026-02378-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.