ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Integration of deworming into primary healthcare in Western Kenya: a quasi-experimental evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The WHO 2030 NTD roadmap calls for integrating mass drug administration (MDA) into primary healthcare (PHC) systems. A coverage evaluation survey conducted in Western Kenya exposed the persistent limitations of mass drug administration campaigns, showing that nearly 25% of surveyed individuals never received treatment. The effect of stock-outs and ineffective mobilizations were also noted. To consolidate the gains from previous mass drug administrations (MDAs), integration of MDA into Primary Health Care (PHC) services was piloted through the Deworming Innovation Fund by leveraging community health structures and digital health platforms for improved delivery. Methodology: A quasi-experimental controlled before-and-after (CBA) study was conducted across 24 wards that were selected based on high helminth prevalence, comparable population size, facility availability, and accessibility for monitoring (12 intervention, 12 control) in Bungoma, Kakamega, Vihiga, and Trans-Nzoia counties. The start date of intervention was in April 2025, Findings: The integrated PHC model in the intervention group helped to increase deworming coverage from 58.4% to 75%; representing an adjusted odd ratio of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.48-3.09). This is in comparison to other control areas where coverage changed only marginally from 57.1% to 60.3%. However, the possible unmeasured programme and confounding implementation limits the quasi-experimental design. As a result, results are mostly relevant to county healthcare managers, NGOs and policymakers. These are people seeking scalable child healthcare interventions in endemic environments. Health facilities became a prominent awareness source only in intervention sites (30% at endline vs. 15% at baseline). In contrast, our study found lower non-treatment rates at 5% (compared to about a quarter reported in the 2024 MDA Coverage Evaluation Survey (CES), potentially reflecting the impact of the integrated approach or differences in recall period and sampling. The 5% of households reporting never receiving treatment were associated with various reasons, including; ineligibility (56%) or absence (17%), not lack of awareness (1%). Control wards showed sharp declines in awareness post-campaign, while intervention wards maintained or improved awareness through routine facility contacts. Recommendations: PHC-integrated deworming achieved effective coverage comparable to traditional campaigns, with superior sustainability of awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.