ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2026
Improving mortality prediction in older adults with traumatic brain injury: incorporating neurological and imaging scores into Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score.
Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting mortality in elderly traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is challenging. The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) may underestimate risk in moderate to severe cases. We hypothesized that integrating the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Rotterdam CT Score (RCS) into GTOS would enhance mortality prediction.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included trauma patients aged ≥65 years with head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥3 and admission GCS ≤12, treated at a tertiary trauma center between January 2016 and December 2024. Three models were assessed: (1) GTOS only; (2) GTOS+GCS; and (3) GTOS+RCS, with GTOS logit as an offset for recalibration. Discrimination and calibration were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, calibration intercept, and slope. Internal validation of the models were performed using 200 bootstrap samples. Net clinical benefit was compared using decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsA total of 171 patients were included, of whom 111 survived and 60 did not. The GTOS model showed poor performance (AUC=0.538, 95%
conclusionIntegrating RCS into GTOS enhances mortality prediction accuracy and clinical utility for elderly TBI patients. The combined model demonstrates superior discrimination, calibration, and decision analytic benefit, suggesting the need for prospective validation in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.