Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499978›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of emergency medicine2026

Artificial intelligence in the emergency department-- applications, perceptions and limitations: a narrative review.

Kamyab Pirouz, Vadym Shapovalov, Quincy K Tran, Sophie Gorup, Arman Hussain, Ali Pourmand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kamyab Pirouz1Department of Emergency Medicine, the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC 20037, USA.
Vadym Shapovalov2Department of Emergency Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown 18104, USA.
Quincy K Tran3Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201-1544, USA.
Sophie Gorup1Department of Emergency Medicine, the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC 20037, USA.
Arman Hussain1Department of Emergency Medicine, the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC 20037, USA.
Ali Pourmand1Department of Emergency Medicine, the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC 20037, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into emergency department (ED) workflows to assist with time-sensitive decision-making, documentation, diagnostics, and education. AI encompasses multiple computational approaches, including traditional machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and large language models (LLMs). We aim to provide insight into the current integration of AI into the multiple clinical spheres of the emergency medicine.

methodsThis narrative review analyzes available literature on the implementation of ML-based predictive systems, DL-based image and signal interpretation tools, and LLM-driven documentation and clinical reasoning support within emergency medicine.

resultsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed and SCOPUS from its inception to October 30, 2025. Overall, 189 articles were found, among them 51 were included in the final review. ML and DL models demonstrated strong performance in electrocardiogram interpretation, radiographic triage, and sepsis prediction, in some cases outperforming traditional clinical scoring tools. LLMs showed promise in documentation support, discharge summary generation, triage assistance, and educational applications; however, concerns remain regarding generalizability and clinical reliability. AI-assisted triage systems improved prioritization and time-to-provider metrics in selected settings but require further validation.

conclusionAI holds substantial potential to augment emergency care delivery. Nevertheless, issues of transparency, bias, accountability, and human oversight remain critical. Current evidence supports AI as a clinical support tool rather than a replacement for physician judgment.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEducationEmergency MedicineOptimization

Identifiers

PMID42499978
PMCPMC13395587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.