ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model to predict high-risk patients with acute small bowel obstruction.
Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common emergency surgical disease for which identifying patients need emergency surgical resection due to nonviable small bowel tissue poses a significant challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model to guide surgical decision-making using readily available clinical data.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Wuhan Union Hospital between 2017 and 2023 to establish the prediction model, with an external validation cohort from two other medical centers. Six machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression [LR], Random Forest [RF], K Nearest-Neighbours [KNN], Multilayer Perceptron [MLP], Adaptive Boosting [AdaBoost] and eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost]) were employed, and the final model was based on LR classifier. Performance was evaluated with various metrics including AUC-ROC, accuracy, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used for model interpretation.
resultsHigh-risk and low-risk SBO groups differed significantly in clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment, and outcome variables. Ten predictors were retained: white blood cell count, history of abdominal operation, platelet, albumin, neutrophil, spiral sign, acute bellyache, ascites, lymphocyte count, and rebound tenderness. After comparing the six algorithms, LR was selected because it showed the most consistent generalization and calibration. The final LR model achieved an AUC of 0.889 (95%
conclusionAn interpretable machine learning model was developed and validated for prediction of high-risk SBO patients upon admission. The model may offer decision support for clinicians, aiding in risk stratification and guiding treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.