ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
A single-source preoperative prediction model for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after primary discectomy: Development and internal validation in the SPORT registry.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) follows primary discectomy in 5% to 25% of patients. Existing models often embed postoperative variables, merge data from unlinked repositories, or omit calibration and clinical-utility assessment. We aimed to develop and internally validate a strictly preoperative model for rLDH using a single multi-center registry, with calibration-first evaluation, decision curve analysis, and a SHAP-aligned clinical score (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Methods: This retrospective development and split-sample internal validation study used the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar disc herniation cohort; 738 of 1,244 enrolled patients met inclusion criteria. The outcome was symptomatic rLDH at the index level within 2 years, confirmed radiologically or by reoperation. Thirteen preoperative predictors and 4 algorithms (elastic-net logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine) were evaluated, trained on 70% with stratified 5-fold cross-validation and 500-resample optimism correction, then tested on a 30% holdout. Reporting followed TRIPOD+AI. Results: Recurrence occurred in 110 patients (14.9%). Logistic regression performed best: AUC 0.738 (95% CI 0.694-0.782; optimism-corrected 0.724), calibration slope 0.94, Brier score 0.112. SHAP identified annular defect size, smoking, and younger age as the most influential predictors. A 10-item score stratified patients into low- (5.8%), moderate- (15.2%), and high-risk (32.6%) groups. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit across threshold probabilities of 8% to 30%. Conclusions: A timing-consistent, single-registry preoperative model achieved acceptable discrimination and calibration for rLDH. The SHAP-aligned score offers transparent preoperative risk stratification; external validation is required before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.