ArticleJHLT open2026
Outcomes of lung transplantation using TorEx ex-vivo lung perfusion.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has expanded donor lung utilization, with over 1000 cases performed at our center since 2008. A next-generation Toronto EVLP system (TorEx EVLP) was introduced in December 2022, enabling simplified circuit setup by loading an organ chamber into an all‑in‑one device, potentially facilitating EVLP use at less experienced centers. This study reports the initial experience with TorEx EVLP and compares outcomes with (1) first‑generation EVLP and (2) conventional lung transplantation without EVLP. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 1067 EVLP procedures were performed from September 2008 to September 2024 (first-generation EVLP [G1], n=874; TorEx EVLP [G2], n=193). Post-transplant short- and long-term outcomes were compared among G1, G2, and contemporaneous direct transplants without EVLP (direct, n=1575). Results: Of 1067 EVLP cases, 684 were accepted for transplant (utilization: G1 64.4%, G2 62.7%), and 700 transplants were performed (including 16 split singles). G1 and G2 had significantly higher DCD donor use (direct vs G1 vs G2: 17% vs 48% vs 60%, p<0.001) and lower donor P/F ratios (422 vs 368 vs 368 mmHg, p<0.001). Recipients in G1 and G2 were older than direct recipients (59 vs 61 vs 65 years, p<0.05). Post‑transplant outcomes were similar across groups, including PGD3 at 72 h (15% vs 16% vs 10%, p=0.21), extubation within 72 h (65% vs 64% vs 68%, p=0.67), overall survival, and CLAD‑free survival. Conclusions: Despite higher-risk donor use, outcomes with both first- and next-generation Toronto EVLP systems were comparable to direct transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.