ArticleHealth care science2026
Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Healthcare in a Brazilian Municipality: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Teleophthalmology.
Article in Health care science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a complication of diabetes and the leading cause of irreversible blindness in people of working age. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among individuals taking insulin who attend the primary healthcare in the municipality of Jardinópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study with a sample of 152 participants, in which data collection occurred in March 2023 by means of interviews, laboratory exams and fundoscopy with a portable retinal camera mounted onto a device attached to a smartphone. The captured images were automatically analysed by means of deep learning algorithms for grading retinal alterations, as well as diabetic retinopathy. Results: The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was estimated to be 28.3% (95% CI 21.1-35.4), with most of the cases corresponding to mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (65.1%). No association was found between diabetic retinopathy and the variables investigated. Concordance test between self-reported and diagnosed diabetic retinopathy showed a Kappa coefficient of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.13-0.47), in which 16.5% of the participants reported having no diabetic retinopathy despite being diagnosed as having it. However, 9.9% of the participants self-reporting having diabetic retinopathy were not diagnosed with it. Conclusions: The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy is within the national range. The lack of knowledge on the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and aspects related to such a complication of diabetes was found to be worrying. Therefore, one highlights the importance of primary healthcare programmes in promoting integral care to people with diabetes, including ocular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.