Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499602›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A motivation-based theoretical framework for understanding short-form video use and mental health among university students.

Zikang Yan, Wei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zikang YanSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-form video platforms have become a central psychological environment in university life, yet their mental health significance cannot be explained by total screen time alone. This hypothesis-and-theory article develops the Motivation-Affordance-Capacity-Outcome framework (MACO) to explain why similar short-form video duration may produce protective, neutral, problematic, or clinically meaningful outcomes among university students. MACO is revised here as a shorter, more testable, and platform-specific framework. Its distinctive contribution rests on three mechanisms: session-in-context analysis, motivational drift, and algorithmic feedback loops. The framework argues that entry motives are translated by short-form-video affordances into engagement modes; that self-regulatory capacity and baseline vulnerability shape whether use remains flexible; and that algorithmic feedback can stabilize either adaptive or maladaptive patterns over repeated sessions. The article clarifies how MACO differs from I-PACE, the active-passive model, compensatory Internet use theory, and differential susceptibility approaches by generating comparative predictions about short-form video versus long-form video, text forums, traditional television, and general social media. It also specifies falsifiable propositions, disconfirmation criteria, and operational indicators for constructs such as motivational drift, socially saturated loneliness, perceived algorithmic agency, and motivational alignment. Particular attention is given to Chinese and East Asian university contexts as theoretically important boundary conditions rather than assumed universal settings. The framework supports interventions that move beyond generic screen-time reduction toward motive-specific diagnosis, digital mindfulness, sleep-protective friction, credibility support, platform design changes, and culturally responsive mental health education.

Indexed as

algorithmic feedbackmental healthmotivational driftself-regulationshort-form videouniversity studentsusage motivation

Identifiers

PMID42499602
PMCPMC13395765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.