ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A motivation-based theoretical framework for understanding short-form video use and mental health among university students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-form video platforms have become a central psychological environment in university life, yet their mental health significance cannot be explained by total screen time alone. This hypothesis-and-theory article develops the Motivation-Affordance-Capacity-Outcome framework (MACO) to explain why similar short-form video duration may produce protective, neutral, problematic, or clinically meaningful outcomes among university students. MACO is revised here as a shorter, more testable, and platform-specific framework. Its distinctive contribution rests on three mechanisms: session-in-context analysis, motivational drift, and algorithmic feedback loops. The framework argues that entry motives are translated by short-form-video affordances into engagement modes; that self-regulatory capacity and baseline vulnerability shape whether use remains flexible; and that algorithmic feedback can stabilize either adaptive or maladaptive patterns over repeated sessions. The article clarifies how MACO differs from I-PACE, the active-passive model, compensatory Internet use theory, and differential susceptibility approaches by generating comparative predictions about short-form video versus long-form video, text forums, traditional television, and general social media. It also specifies falsifiable propositions, disconfirmation criteria, and operational indicators for constructs such as motivational drift, socially saturated loneliness, perceived algorithmic agency, and motivational alignment. Particular attention is given to Chinese and East Asian university contexts as theoretically important boundary conditions rather than assumed universal settings. The framework supports interventions that move beyond generic screen-time reduction toward motive-specific diagnosis, digital mindfulness, sleep-protective friction, credibility support, platform design changes, and culturally responsive mental health education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.