Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Measuring student perceptions of motivation and engagement with Kahoot!: a case study in primary education in Portugal.

Raquel Lopes, Ana Baptista, Sergii Tukaiev, Vaitsa Giannouli, João Alves Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raquel LopesPiaget Research Center for Ecological Human Development, Jean Piaget Higher School of Education of Almada, Almada, Portugal.
Ana BaptistaDepartment of Special Education, School Grouping of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Sergii TukaievHigher Institute of Science Education and Technology, USI Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Vaitsa GiannouliDepartment of Psychology, Democritus University of Thrace, Didymoteicho, Greece.
João Alves FerreiraFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of digital tools in teaching remains a challenge for many educators, often due to resistance to change and limited training. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, as proposed by Deci and Ryan, and Cognitive Load Theory, developed by Sweller, this exploratory study examines student motivation and engagement in a gamified learning environment. Specifically, it explores students' perceptions of the use of Kahoot! in the classroom and the extent to which the tool may add value to the teaching and learning process. The study involved 20 fourth-grade students and their class teacher from a public school cluster in the Central region of Portugal. Data were collected through a student questionnaire, a semi-structured teacher interview, and audiovisual recording of the classroom session. Descriptive findings suggest that students perceived Kahoot! positively, particularly in terms of enjoyment, engagement, perceived usefulness, and peer interaction, while the teacher highlighted its usefulness for real-time formative assessment. However, technical constraints and connectivity problems limited implementation. Given the exploratory design, small convenience sample, dichotomous items, and absence of validated psychometric measures and a control group, the findings do not support causal inference. The study therefore contributes context-specific evidence and points to the need for future research using experimental designs and validated instruments.

Indexed as

formative assessmentgamificationinclusive educationmotivationstudent engagement

Identifiers

PMID42499599
PMCPMC13395852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.