ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Cross-sectional gut microbiota and serum metabolite differences across clinically defined groups in colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignancy associated with alterations in the gut microbiota and host metabolic profiles. This cross-sectional study aimed to characterize gut microbiota and serum metabolite differences among healthy controls (HC), patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC-nm), and patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC-m). Stool metagenomic sequencing and untargeted serum metabolomics were performed in 107 participants, followed by exploratory differential analyses and internally cross-validated modeling to identify candidate microbial and metabolic features and evaluate their discriminatory performance. Differential analyses identified two CRC-m-enriched species-level features (Enterocloster clostridioformis and Lactobacillus crispatus) and two CRC-m-depleted features (Megamonas rupellensis and Phocaeicola plebeius) across comparisons with both CRC-nm and HC groups. Metabolomic analysis identified eight pathway-mapped metabolites, mainly involved in amino acid-related metabolic pathways. In modeling analyses, metabolite-only models provided the primary discriminatory signal, whereas adding bacterial features did not improve predictive performance. Integrated microbiota-metabolite models showed lower internal performance than metabolite-only models in some comparisons, including CRC-m versus CRC-nm. Overall, these findings suggest that observed discriminatory performance was primarily driven by serum metabolite features rather than additional bacterial features, and highlight candidate microbial and metabolic markers for future validation. Because all CRC-m cases were stage IV and all CRC-nm cases were stages I-III, these results should be interpreted as exploratory cross-sectional group differences that may reflect disease stage, tumor burden, or broader progression-related changes rather than metastasis-specific biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.