Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499537›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health

Conceptual Hypothesis: An Integrative Map of Mind for Coaches.

Margaret Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Margaret MooreFounder and CEO, Wellcoaches Corporation, Wellesley, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2801-2287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article proposes an integrative map of mind designed to support whole-person, well-being coaching. It extends the author's 2013 hypothesis published in this journal, "Coaching the Multiplicity of Mind: A Strengths-Based Model," by aligning the author's nine science-informed capacities with Hartman's axiology, which describes three dimensions of value (Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Systemic) and their 3×3=9 matrix of pairings. The nine pairings, referred to as nine value positions in this paper, are aligned with Self-Determination Theory, the Enneagram, Jung's cognitive functions, and the Big Five Ten Aspect personality traits. They are further organized into three functional bands (identity, stabilizing, and growth) with Confidence as the center, reflecting integration and wholeness. The nine value positions are recognizable as distinct ways people orient to experience through valuing, motivation, and attention, while remaining fluid, contextual, and interconnected in action. Organized into a map, they help coaches recognize which orientations are active, which are underrepresented, and where tensions between positions may call for self-awareness and integration. The integrative map is offered as a working hypothesis: a shared set of value positions that can align psychological frameworks commonly applied in coaching as a set of dimensions of each of the shared value positions. The map may allow coaches to (1) work from one map rather than holding many constructs and frameworks in parallel, (2) recognize which orientations a client is engaging and which are underrepresented, (3) approach tensions as integration opportunities.

Indexed as

provider wellbeingself-careself-efficacyself-managementself-regulationwhole health

Identifiers

PMID42499537
PMCPMC13396571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.