Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499521›Full record

ReviewEndoscopic ultrasound

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy

Mohammad Al Hayek, Marco Spadaccini, Ammar Fahaid, Mouen Khashab, Alberto Larghi, Antonio Facciorusso, Osamah Al Hayek, Muhammed Elhadi, John J Vargo, Douglas G Adler and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammad Al HayekFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Marco SpadacciniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Ammar FahaidFaculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya.
Mouen KhashabDivision of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alberto LarghiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio FacciorussoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Osamah Al HayekFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Muhammed ElhadiCollege of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic Korea.
John J VargoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Douglas G AdlerCenter for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Centura Health, Porter Hospital, Peak Gastroenterology, Denver, CO, USA.
Cesare HassanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction is a frequent complication of advanced pancreatic and gastric antral malignancies requiring palliative intervention. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has emerged as an alternative to enteral stent placement (ESP), but comparative evidence remains limited. We conducted a pairwise and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing EUS-GE with duodenal stent placement in adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were performed from inception through November 15, 2025. Stent-related failure was the primary outcome and was analyzed as a time-to-event endpoint using reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, overall survival, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. Random-effects models were applied using hazard ratios and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Ten studies comprising 1359 patients were included. EUS-GE was associated with a significantly lower rate of stent-related failure compared with duodenal stenting (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.73;

Indexed as

enteral stentingEUS–guided gastroenterostomyindividual patient data meta-analysismalignant gastric outlet obstructionpalliative endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID42499521
PMCPMC13400025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.