ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Altered Spontaneous Brain Activity in Adolescents and Adults with Comitant Strabismus and Strabismic Amblyopia.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Neuroimaging studies have established that strabismus and amblyopia are associated with structural and functional brain alterations. However, differences in spontaneous brain activity between strabismus patients with and without amblyopia remain unclear. This study employed fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF), a normalized version of the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation that reduces physiological noise and improves detection of spontaneous brain activity, to examine spontaneous brain activity patterns in comitant strabismus (CS) and strabismic amblyopia (SA) patients in adolescents and adults. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Seventeen patients with CS (10 males and 7 females; mean age, 24.41 ± 6.70 years), 19 patients with SA (9 males and 10 females; mean age, 24.53 ± 6.12 years), and 22 normal controls (12 males and 10 females; mean age, 22.29 ± 3.93 years) were recruited. Methods: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed. Main Outcome Measures: Spontaneous brain activity was assessed using fALFF. Pearson correlation analysis was employed to examine the relationships between fALFF values in altered brain regions and clinical manifestations. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to descriptively evaluate the discriminatory capacity of fALFF signals between SA and CS patients in this exploratory sample. Results: Compared with normal controls, both CS and SA patients showed widespread fALFF alterations in visual, sensorimotor, and higher-order cognitive regions. Relative to CS patients, SA patients showed reduced fALFF in the bilateral frontal lobes and elevated fALFF in the left precentral gyrus. An exploratory analysis revealed that fALFF values in the left middle frontal gyrus of SA patients were negatively correlated with the best-corrected visual acuity of the amblyopic eye (r = -0.49, nominal Conclusions: Patients with CS and SA demonstrate distinct patterns of abnormal spontaneous brain activity. Exploratory associations, particularly in the frontal lobe, were observed with visual acuity loss in amblyopia and may be associated with differing neuropathological states between the 2 conditions. These findings provide neuroimaging evidence that contributes to the understanding of strabismus and amblyopia pathophysiology and may inform future research into neural markers of disease progression. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.