Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499475›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2026

CONGENITAL PROXIMAL RADIOULNAR SYNOSTOSIS: RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES IN TWO CASES WITH REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

S J Ayilara, R B Olatunji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S J AyilaraRainbow Scans, Ibadan Nigeria.
R B OlatunjiRainbow Scans, Ibadan Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS) is an uncommon developmental defect caused by failure of segmentation between the radius and ulna during early embryonic life. Despite its rarity, it is the most prevalent congenital functional abnormality affecting the elbow. Clinical presentation varies widely, ranging from subtle cosmetic concerns to significant restriction of forearm rotation with consequent limitations in activities of daily living. Case 1: A 4-year-old girl presented with inability to fully extend her left elbow since birth, accompanied by progressively worsening difficulty performing daily tasks involving the affected limb. There was also a history of absent left thumb noted at birth. Plain radiographs of the left forearm demonstrated symmetrical shortening of the radioulnar diaphysis, hypoplasia and posterior dislocation of the radial head, absence of the distal radial epiphysis, and osseous fusion of the proximal radius and ulna. Radiographs of both hands further revealed asymmetry of the left hand with aplasia of the first digit. Case 2: A 13-year-old girl was evaluated for lifelong inability to extend both elbows, with increasing functional impairment of her forearms during routine activities. Plain radiographs of both forearms showed bilateral, symmetrical osseous fusion of the proximal radius and ulna with posteriorly dislocated radial heads. Additional findings included symmetrical bowing of the radial and ulnar shafts, penciling of the distal ulnar metaphysis, and positive ulnar variance. Conclusion: These cases demonstrate the diverse clinical spectrum of CRUS and emphasize the critical role of radiographic assessment in accurate classification and detection of associated anomalies. Prompt diagnosis and comprehensive functional evaluation are vital for optimal management planning.

Indexed as

ChildrenCongenital radioulnar synostosisMusculoskeletal anomalyOrthopaedicsRadiologyThumb aplasia

Identifiers

PMID42499475
PMCPMC13399566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.