ArticleKidney medicine2026
Association of Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate With Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rationale and Objective: Cystatin C-based versus creatinine-based measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are more predictive of worse outcomes in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It is unknown if cystatin C-based measures may also yield more accurate prognoses in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Study Design: A longitudinal analysis of people with HFpEF. Setting & Participants: 214 participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial with available serum at baseline and 12 months in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center. Exposures: Baseline, time-varying, or change over 12 months in eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and eGFRcr-cys. Outcomes: Composite of aborted cardiac arrest, heart failure hospitalization, or cardiovascular death. Analytical Approach: Fine-Gray and joint models. Results: Median follow-up was (IQR) 3.09 (2.07-4.44) years. All 3 baseline eGFR measures were independently associated with the risk of the composite endpoint, after adjustment for race, diabetes mellitus, and body mass index: HR (95% CI) per 5mL/min/1.73m Limitations: small number of events, possible survival bias. Conclusions: A decline in eGFRcr-cys from baseline to 12 months is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in people wit reduced ejection fraction h HFrEF. Measures of eGFR that incorporate only cystatin C may not be of greater prognostic value in people with HFpEF than measures that also incorporate serum creatinine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.