ReviewFrontiers in big data2026
A dataset-centric review of IoT and IIoT intrusion detection: realism, evaluation biases, and future research directions.
Review in Frontiers in big data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid growth of IoT and IIoT expands the cyber-attack surface of interconnected and safety-critical systems, and, as such, IDSs have become a fundamental security mechanism. Although very impressive results have been reported for machine learning and deep learning-based IDS in benchmark datasets, these gains often do not generalize to real-world deployments owing to dataset design limitations, realism deficits, and evaluation biases, rather than inherent flaws in detection algorithms, which can lead to significant vulnerabilities in actual operational environments. This study presents a dataset-centric review of widely used intrusion detection datasets from the IIoT, IoT, and traditional network domains. A unified taxonomy differentiates datasets based on the domain context, traffic representation, protocol semantics, and attack modeling assumptions. Based on a common analytical framework, each dataset was reviewed regarding its realism, coverage of the threats, class imbalance, temporal continuity, and modern ML/DL-based evaluation of the IDS. The cross-dataset analysis conducted in this study shows that, in addition to the fact that model architecture and feature engineering play a major role, several studies indicate that the simplicity of the datasets, the class imbalance, and the repetitive attack patterns as well as the evaluation methods can affect accuracy of the IDS. This work further underlines the remaining gaps, such as zero-day and adaptive attacks, limited encrypted traffic, weak temporal evolution, poor support for federated learning, and sparse annotations for explainable IDSs. Finally, this study presents future directions for dataset design aligned with the requirements of next-generation IDSs by highlighting digital twin-based IIoT environments, edge-cloud collaborative data generation, sequential traffic modeling, and explainability-oriented annotations that can ensure robust, trustworthy, and deployment-ready IDS solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.