ArticleGalen medical journal2026
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Faculty's Academic Performance and Well-Being : Short title: COVID-19 Pandemic and Medical Faculty's Academic Performance and Well-Being.
Article in Galen medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the effects of stress related to the pandemic on the medical faculty's well-being. Materials and Methods: This study investigated the impact of pandemic-related stress on the well-being of medical faculty at King Abdulaziz University. Using a mixed-methods approach, 82 faculty members completed online surveys, including the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scales to measure anxiety and depression, and participated in focus group discussions. The analysis explored the relationship between these psychological stress factors and self-reported academic performance across different demographics. Results: A high prevalence of psychological distress was found: 89.6% of faculty reported at least mild anxiety, and 84.4% reported at least mild depressive symptoms. Most participants self-rated their academic performance as good (54.5%) or excellent (36.4%), and 80.5% reported missing no crucial deadlines. Regression analyses revealed a significant positive association between depression severity and higher self-reported academic performance (β = 1.48, p = 0.025). Male gender (OR = 0.20, p = 0.022) and longer weekly working hours (OR = 0.53, p = 0.019) were associated with significantly lower odds of missing deadlines. Anxiety, depression, and other covariates were not significant predictors of overall quality of life. Conclusion: While the pandemic was associated with a high burden of anxiety and depression among faculty, this distress did not translate into widespread self-perceived declines in academic output. The counterintuitive link between higher depression scores and self-reported performance, alongside the protective effect of male gender and increased work hours against missed deadlines, suggests complex coping mechanisms and potential resilience or presenteeism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.