ReviewGalen medical journal2026
Diagnostic Performance and Radio-Pathologic Correlation of Image-Guided Biopsy in Head and Neck Lesions: A Systematic Review : Short title: Diagnostic Performance and Radio-Pathologic Correlation of Image-Guided Biopsy in Head and Neck Lesions.
Review in Galen medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of head and neck lesions relies heavily on image-guided biopsy techniques, which facilitate targeted sampling and enable radiologic-pathologic correlation. Increasing use of CT-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) necessitates updated evaluation of their diagnostic performance and safety. To systematically identify, appraise, and synthesize published evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, tissue adequacy, and radio-pathologic concordance of image-guided biopsy for head and neck lesions. Materials and Methods: This review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251181567). Searches were conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2018-September 2025). Eligible studies included human subjects undergoing image-guided FNAC or CNB with reported diagnostic outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality using QUADAS-2. Due to methodological and clinical heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not performed. Results: From 345 records, eight studies met inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective (8/10), evaluating CT-guided FNAC, CNB, or percutaneous needle biopsy across cervical, suprahyoid, salivary, lymphatic, thyroid, and skull base lesions. Diagnostic sensitivities ranged from 85-95%, specificities from 92-97%, and overall accuracies from 90-96%. Diagnostic yield was high (85-100%), and radio-pathologic concordance consistently exceeded 87%. Complications were uncommon and generally minor, except for hilar lymph node biopsies, which showed higher pneumothorax rates. Conclusion: Image-guided biopsy of head and neck lesions demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and excellent radio-pathologic concordance across diverse anatomic regions, supporting its role as a reliable, minimally invasive diagnostic tool. Despite strong performance in deep and complex spaces, procedure-specific complication risks-particularly in hilar lymph node sampling-should inform clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.