ArticleGalen medical journal2026
Surface Topography and Pushout Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts with Different Surface Treatments to Root Dentin Following Cementation by Precuring and Co-Curing Methods : Short title: Surface Topography and Pushout Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts to Root Dentin Following Cementation.
Article in Galen medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study assessed the surface topography and pushout bond strength (PBS) of glass fiber posts (GFPs) with different surface treatments to root dentin following cementation by precuring and co-curing methods. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 80 extracted single-rooted premolars were decoronated and randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=20) for surface treatment of GFPs with 20% H2O2, Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm, 90 mJ, 4.5 W, 50 Hz, 60 seconds) and sandblasting (50 µm aluminum oxide particles, 2.8 bar pressure, 10 mm distance, 20 seconds). No surface treatment was performed in group 4. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups (n=10) for cementation of GFPs with precuring and co-curing methods. The PBS was measured, the mode of failure was determined, and the surface topography of the posts was assessed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey, and Dunnett tests (alpha=0.05). Results: The mean PBS of H2O2-treated GFPs was significantly higher in co-curing than precuring method (P=0.04). No significant difference was found between the precuring and co-curing in PBS of GFPs with other surface treatments (P0.05). The mean PBS of sandblasted, laser-treated, and H2O2-treated GFPs was not significantly different in precuring method. In co-curing cementation, sandblasting significantly decreased the PBS (P=0.04) while laser and H2O2 surface treatments had no significant effect on PBS (P0.05). Conclusion: The co-curing cementation method yielded a significantly higher PBS than the precuring method in H2O2-treated GFPs. Sandblasting significantly decreased the PBS of GFPs cemented by the co-curing method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.