ReviewNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2026
Prime editing in neuropsychiatric disorders: From mutation-specific target selection to clinical translation.
Review in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prime editing in neuropsychiatric disorders: From mutation-specific target selection to clinical translation.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prime editing, a novel clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based technology, fuses a reverse transcriptase (RT) to an engineered CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) and uses a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA)-encoded template. It enables precise base substitutions, small insertions, and deletions without introducing double-strand breaks, thereby expanding the range of correctable mutations while reducing undesired repair outcomes. This technology offers a promising strategy for genomic correction in the nervous system. Here, we review the development of prime editing, its mechanistic rationale, and emerging preclinical evidence that supports its application in neuropsychiatric disorders. We discuss key biological and technological barriers, including limited editing efficiency in post-mitotic neurons, complex pegRNA design, reverse transcription-related errors, vector payload limitations, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration. Nevertheless, in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated proof-of-concept correction and functional rescue in several monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders. Advances such as split-adeno-associated virus (AAV) systems, lipid nanoparticles, engineered peptides, and compact Cas variants are actively expanding their therapeutic potential. Further clinical translation will rely on improved editors with guide engineering, BBB-penetrant and neuron-targeted delivery platforms, transient or cell-type-specific expression strategies, and comprehensive genome-wide safety evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.