ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Memorizing the future: Encoding anticipated interactions enhances human memory for dynamic stimuli.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survival in nature requires responding to rapidly changing situations, where memory is crucial for fast and reliable decision-making. This work explores human memory modulation under the hypothesis that in dynamic scenarios critical information is encoded as static maps of future interactions. Results show that dynamic stimuli containing future interactions are recalled 36% better than equivalent stimuli that do not and even 23% better than simpler dynamic stimuli. This aligns with a central prediction of the time-compaction hypothesis, suggesting that stimuli involving anticipated interactions may be more efficiently memorized and recalled because they are compatible with simplified static representations of future interactions-their maps of interactions. This effect is modulated by stimulus complexity: in simple scenarios, recall differences appear only in men, while in more complex situations, no gender bias emerges. This work reveals novel mechanisms by which memory can cope with dynamic situations, suggesting that those critical to survival-fighting, chasing, or fleeing-are preferentially remembered, enabling efficient learning and decision-making in a complex changing world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.