Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499285›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026

Correlates of Rural Naloxone Possession Among People Who Use Drugs: A Multi-State Cross-Sectional Analysis.

P Quincy Moore, L Sarah Mixson, Rebecca Bolinski, David C Colston, Hannah L F Cooper, Heidi M Crane, Jackson Devadas, Judith Feinberg, Peter D Friedmann, Rachel E Gicquelais and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

P Quincy MooreDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8281-0677
L Sarah MixsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5149-8859
Rebecca BolinskiDepartment of Population Science and Policy, Southern Illinois School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-3109
David C ColstonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Hannah L F CooperRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Heidi M CraneDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jackson DevadasDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Judith FeinbergDepartment of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4206-7214
Peter D FriedmannDepartment of Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel E GicquelaisDepartments of Population Health Sciences and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Wiley D JenkinsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Dalia KhouryCenter for Behavioral Health Data, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
P Todd KorthuisSchool of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Gordon SmithDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Thomas J StopkaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ryan WestergaardDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
April YoungDepartment of Epidemiology & Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-3249
Mai T PhoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases & Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Appalachian Regional CommissionCDC HHS U24DA044801CDC HHS U24DA048538CDC HHS UG3DA044798/UH3DA044798CDC HHS UG3DA044822/UH3DA044822CDC HHS UG3DA044823/UH3DA044823CDC HHS UG3DA044825CDC HHS UG3DA044826/UH3DA044826CDC HHS UG3DA044829/UH3DA044829CDC HHS UG3DA044830/UH3DA044830CDC HHS UG3DA044831/UH3DA044831National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNaloxone administration by laypersons is proven to reduce opioid overdose mortality. Despite legislative advances, people who use drugs (PWUD) in rural settings face unique barriers to naloxone possession. This study aims to examine naloxone possession and identify its correlates among a large, geographically diverse sample of people who either use opioids or inject drugs in rural areas.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis using Rural Opioid Initiative (ROI) data from rural counties of ten US states. Study sites administered a harmonized survey instrument of 3048 PWUD recruited from January 2018 to March 2020. The primary outcome was current naloxone possession. Potential correlates were identified through review of the literature. Data were collected on demographics, drug use behaviors, overdose experiences, access to care, and addiction treatment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate associations, and multivariable prevalence ratios.

findingsAmong 3008 participants included in the analysis, 36.4% reported possessing naloxone. Naloxone possession was associated with younger age, illegal income sources, past 30-day opioid use, personal history of overdose, witnessing an overdose, knowing someone who died from an overdose, current injection drug use, and receiving syringes from syringe service programs (SSPs). No association was found between access to care and naloxone possession.

conclusionsOnly 36% of high-risk rural PWUD possessed naloxone. Factors such as injection drug use, overdose history, and SSP access increased the likelihood of naloxone possession. These findings highlight the need for targeted naloxone distribution strategies in rural areas, considering the unique barriers faced by rural PWUD.

Indexed as

Drug UsersNaloxoneRural PopulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsharm reductionnaloxoneopioidoverdosepeople who use drugs

Identifiers

PMID42499285
PMCPMC13401094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.