ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Accentuated Eccentric Loading Increases Maximal Countermovement Jump Height Without Changes in Overall Lower Limb Kinetics and Energetics.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the mechanical and energetic responses to accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) during maximal countermovement jumps (CMJ) and examined potential mechanisms underlying performance enhancement relative to bodyweight CMJs. We hypothesized that increased lower limb forces during loading would enhance positive work output during push-off. Fifteen recreationally active men with good jumping ability (22.3 ± 4.5 years, 1.85 ± 0.06 m, and 79.1 ± 9.6 kg) performed maximal CMJ with and without AEL using handheld dumbbells equivalent to 20% body mass. Compared with bodyweight CMJs, AEL CMJ increased (p < 0.05) effective jump height (d = 0.521), center-of-mass work (d = 0.405), mean vertical ground reaction force (d = 0.346), peak (d = 0.864) and mean (d = 0.647) center-of-mass velocity, and peak (d = 0.497) and mean (d = 0.541) center-of-mass power during the propulsive phase. Effective jump height increased by 2.1 cm with AEL (0.548 ± 0.046 m) compared with bodyweight CMJs (0.527 ± 0.036 m). However, total lower-limb joint work during push-off, squat depth, and most lower-limb electromyography parameters did not differ between conditions. Right ankle peak power and work during push-off were lower with AEL, indicating a reduced ankle contribution despite improved jump height. These results do not support the claim that AEL enhances lower-limb work output. Instead, increased center-of-mass work may have originated from segments not included in the joint-level analysis, such as the trunk and upper body. Our findings suggest the hypothesis that altered whole-body coordination, rather than greater lower-limb work, contributed to the performance enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.