ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026
Teaching Systems Thinking in Postgraduate Public Health: A Scoping Review of Curricular Approaches.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Teaching Systems Thinking in Postgraduate Public Health: A Scoping Review of Curricular Approaches.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
issue addressedPublic health professionals need systems-thinking capabilities to address complex health challenges. Systems thinking is increasingly recognised in public health competency frameworks, yet published literature on how it is taught in postgraduate programmes remains limited. This scoping review mapped descriptions of its teaching in that literature.
methodsA search of PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Web of Science was conducted on 15 May 2025 using terms related to public health education and systems thinking. Sources were eligible if they described postgraduate public health programmes with explicit systems thinking content. After screening 1471 records and assessing 32 full texts, 14 sources were included. Data were charted by programme characteristics, systems-thinking focus, pedagogy, tools, assessments and challenges and then analysed using inductive thematic synthesis.
resultsProgrammes were mostly in the United States (7/14). Other examples came from Europe, Canada and Australia. None were from Asia or Africa. Most programmes (11/14) used explicit systems-thinking tools, particularly visual techniques. Approaches and integration depth varied. The review organised reported practices into six review-derived curricular patterns: applied practice, student leadership, research and inquiry, active learning, creative production and reflective practices.
conclusionsSystems thinking was taught in varied ways. Six recurring curricular approaches were developed as review-derived organising categories. SO WHAT?: This review provides a descriptive menu of reported approaches that may inform curriculum design, faculty development and future evaluation of systems thinking pedagogy in postgraduate public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.