Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499155›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026

Consumer Experiences and Perceptions of Genetic Counseling in Provider-Mediated Genetic Testing.

Katherine A Lauro, Bob Wong, Jason Iuliano, Margaret Peo, Jacqueline Park, Karin M Dent, Angela R Bradbury, Madison K Kilbride

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine A LauroGraduate Program in Genetic Counseling, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Bob WongCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jason IulianoS.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Margaret PeoS.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jacqueline ParkCollege of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Karin M DentDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Angela R BradburyDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Madison K KilbrideDepartment of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8923-9944

Funding

Evaluating the Risks and Benefits of the Next Generation of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestsK01HG010903 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KILBRIDE, MADISON K · 2020 to 2023
$695k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG010903NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG010903Utah Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provider-mediated genetic testing (PM-GT) is a hybrid model in which consumers initiate testing online, but a physician, typically from a third-party network, is required to order the test. While genetic counseling is a critical component of result interpretation and medical decision-making, its integration into PM-GT remains limited. This study explored how consumers engaged with genetic counseling in the context of PM-GT, including factors that influenced whether they pursued it and their perceptions of its value. Participants had previously undergone a 59-gene panel test for cancer and cardiovascular disease risk through Color Health, a PM-GT company. Twenty-nine participants completed qualitative interviews about their testing experience and a follow-up survey that was focused on genetic counseling. Post-test counseling was required only for individuals with positive results and was optional for those with negative or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results. Using quantitative content analysis and qualitative inductive content analysis, we found that while most participants did not engage in pre- or post-test counseling, nearly half of those who had not yet spoken with a genetic counselor after receiving their results expressed interest in doing so in the future. Participants often viewed the counseling that was offered by the testing company as helpful for understanding their results, clarifying disease risk, and guiding medical decisions. Time constraints were the most frequently cited barrier to accessing genetic counseling services. These findings indicate a gap between consumers' interest in counseling and their actual uptake of services, suggesting that many consumers who could benefit from counseling do not receive it. More proactive integration of genetic counseling into the PM-GT process could help bridge this gap and ensure that consumers are appropriately supported regardless of their test results.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedattitudescancercardiovascularexperiencesgenetic counselinggenetic counselorgenetic testinggenetic test resultsphysician‐mediated genetic testingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42499155
PMCPMC13400907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.