Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42499136›Full record

ReviewBiomedical chromatography : BMC2026

Analytical Quality by Design-Based Reverse-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method Development for Biomarker: A Comprehensive Review of Quality Assessment and Analytical Trends.

Sakshi B Patil, Shubhangi B Sutar, Rachana Bhimanwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical chromatography : BMC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sakshi B PatilAshokrao Mane College of Pharmacy, Peth Vadgaon, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8741-3616
Shubhangi B SutarAshokrao Mane College of Pharmacy, Peth Vadgaon, India.
Rachana BhimanwarSchool of Pharmacy and Research, Dnyaan Prasad Global University, Pimpri Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6392-1526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers play a crucial role in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring, necessitating the development of reliable and robust analytical methods. Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) is widely employed for biomarker analysis due to its versatility, sensitivity and reproducibility. However, conventional method development approaches are based on trial-and-error strategies, leading to limited robustness and poor reproducibility. The Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) framework has emerged as a systematic approach to overcome these limitations. This review critically evaluates reported RP-HPLC methods for biomarker analysis in the context of AQbD principles. Key elements, including Analytical Target Profile (ATP), Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), Critical Method Parameters (CMPs), risk assessment, Design of Experiments (DoE) and Method Operable Design Region (MODR), are discussed. Analysis of selected studies indicates that most lack comprehensive AQbD implementation, particularly in terms of multivariate optimization, structured risk assessment and design space establishment. Common limitations such as coelution, sensitivity and inadequate robustness are highlighted, along with AQbD-based strategies to address these challenges. Additionally, recent trends, including the integration of machine learning and the adoption of Green and White Analytical Chemistry principles, are discussed to promote sustainable method development. Overall, AQbD offers a robust framework for improving analytical performance for biomarker analysis.

Indexed as

BiomarkersChromatography, Reverse-PhaseChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersanalytical quality by design (AQbD)biomarkermethod developmentquality assessmentRP‐HPLC

Identifiers

PMID42499136
PMCPMC13400901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.