Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498933›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

Sepsis-related immunosuppression: a comprehensive review of current research breakthroughs.

Shuai Ren, Jun Wen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuai RenEmergency Department of Xi'an Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jun WenEmergency Department of Xi'an Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China. 176157731@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article focuses on Sepsis-related immunosuppression, systematically expounding on its pathological mechanisms, monitoring methods, and treatment strategies. Immunosuppression in sepsis involves multi-level functional exhaustion of the innate and adaptive immune systems, such as dysfunctions of monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells, depletion of T and B cells, and imbalance of the cytokine network. The monitoring of the immune state mainly relies on the detection of the quantity and function of immune cells, HLA-DR expression, and cytokine levels. Treatment methods include immunostimulation (such as IL-7, GM-CSF), immune checkpoint inhibitors, other immunomodulatory therapies (such as IFN-γ, mesenchymal stem cells), and intravenous immunoglobulin. However, the clinical transformation effects of existing treatment strategies remain to be verified. In-depth research on sepsis-related immunosuppression is of great significance for improving clinical diagnosis and treatment and reducing mortality.Importantly, the pathogenesis and trajectory of immunosuppression in children differ significantly from adults due to age‑specific immune development, necessitating a separate discussion of pediatric‑specific mechanisms and monitoring strategies.

Indexed as

Immune ToleranceImmunosuppression TherapySepsisCytokinesHumansCytokinesCytokine stormImmunosuppressionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID42498933
PMCPMC13397701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.