ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Agonistic bispecific antibodies: an emerging frontier in antibody therapeutics.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody-based cancer therapies have long been valued for their high target specificity and favorable safety profiles compared with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The field has expanded rapidly, driven in part by advances in antibody engineering and the emergence of antibody-derived modalities. Among these, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) and agonists have independently reshaped the therapeutic landscape by enabling novel mechanisms of action. However, the clinical development of agonists has been hampered by challenges such as systemic toxicity arising from excessive receptor activation and limited efficacy associated with inadequate receptor clustering or context-dependent signaling. To address these limitations, a distinct class of engineered molecules-agonistic bsAbs-has recently emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. By spatially and contextually restricting receptor activation, these antibodies aim to enhance agonistic potency while improving safety and therapeutic index. Notably, in addition to their roles in cancer therapy, agonistic bsAbs also exhibit therapeutic potential in metabolic diseases. In this review, we classify agonistic bsAbs according to the nature of the receptors requiring activation, including immune co-stimulatory receptors, death receptors, and growth factor receptors. For each category, we summarize representative agonistic bsAbs, with a focus on their molecular design principles, mechanisms of action, preclinical and clinical progress, and current limitations. Together, this overview highlights agonistic bispecific antibodies as an evolving and versatile platform with the potential to redefine antibody-based therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.