Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498911›Full record

ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

Evolution of facial identification techniques: A bibliometric analysis (1970 - 2022).

Luiz Alberto Marques, Annie Seabra Medeiros Antunes, Thaiza Gonçalves Rocha, Carla Barros de Oliveira, Márcia Barcelos Gomes Silvares, José Vicente-Gomila, Mariana Leonel Martins, Lucianne Cople Maia, Andréa Fonseca-Gonçalves, Andreia Cristina Breda de Souza and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luiz Alberto MarquesPostgraduate Program, Professional Masters Degree in Clinical Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6441-3271
Annie Seabra Medeiros AntunesPostgraduate Program, Professional Masters Degree in Clinical Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3108-3334
Thaiza Gonçalves RochaDepartment of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1298-1008
Carla Barros de OliveiraDepartment of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-7603
Márcia Barcelos Gomes SilvaresCentral Library of the Health Science Center, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ - Ilha do Fundão, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, Bl L, 373 - Cidade Universitária, 21941-902, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-5186
José Vicente-GomilaDepartment of Enterprise Management, E.S.I.C. Business & Marketing School, Av. de Juan XXIII, 12, Espanha, 28224, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-8964
Mariana Leonel MartinsPostgraduate Program, Professional Masters Degree in Clinical Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-3225
Lucianne Cople MaiaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-9401
Andréa Fonseca-GonçalvesDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-7078
Andreia Cristina Breda de SouzaDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-971, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-4279
Maria Augusta ViscontiDepartment of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21941-971, RJ, Brazil. gutavisconti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8837-8387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study performed a bibliometric analysis of global research on human facial recognition for forensic purposes, identifying trends in techniques, anatomical regions, and methodological evolution over five decades.

methodsSix databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, BVS, and Lilacs) were searched without language or year restrictions. We included studies focusing on human identification through clinical or imaging facial examinations. Data regarding year, journal, authors, keywords, age group, examination type, and methods (metric, morphological, or volumetric) were extracted. Two independent investigators used Rayyan™ for selection, and descriptive analysis was performed using VantagePoint™ and Excel™.

resultsFrom 5016 identified articles, 424 studies published between 1970 and 2022 were included (four systematic reviews, three clinical, 377 observational, and 40 laboratory studies). Forensic Science International was the leading journal (n = 113), and Stephan CN was the most prolific author. Photography was the most used examination (n = 125). Metric analysis prevailed as the primary method (n = 221). While the total face was the most frequent focus (n = 239), the nose emerged as the most studied isolated region (n = 20). Most studies (n = 415) reported identification results.

conclusionFacial identification research has grown significantly, with photography and metric methods remaining the current standards. However, bibliometric trends point toward a paradigm shift: the integration of Artificial Intelligence and 3D volumetric analysis is emerging as a critical frontier to overcome the limitations of conventional 2D techniques, offering superior precision and optimized forensic workflows.

Indexed as

AnthropometryFaceFacial recognitionForensic imagingForensic sciencesPhotography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.