ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Managing patient fears around bariatric surgery: a qualitative study of communication differences between high- and low-referring primary care providers.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObesity affects over 40% of U.S. adults, yet bariatric surgery remains underutilized. Patients often hold fears about surgical complications and lack confidence in weight loss durability. Providers face barriers such as limited knowledge, overestimation of surgical risks, and discomfort with obesity management. This qualitative study investigates provider-perceived barriers and facilitators to bariatric surgery referral, focusing on factors contributing to provider decision-making and patient access.
methodsA qualitative content analysis was conducted on semi-structured, virtual interviews with 17 primary care providers from D.C., Maryland, and Virginia. Providers were categorized as high referrers (> 40 referrals) versus low referrers (≤ 40 referrals) based on annual bariatric surgery referral volumes. An interview guide informed by the Health Equity Implementation Framework was used. An initial deductive approach was used to identify barriers and facilitators, followed by an inductive analysis to capture emergent themes related to health inequities within the referral pathway.
resultsFour domains were identified: (1) clinical decision-making, (2) treatment framing, (3) treatment communication, and (4) system factors. Patient-perceived risks were cited as a barrier by 100% of providers. The most divergent finding was treatment framing: 73% of low referrers framed surgery as a last resort after failure of conservative interventions, compared to 0% of high referrers. High referrers presented a full treatment menu early, reframed patient fears of surgery, and positioned referral as exploratory program entry. Low referrers required patient-initiated motivation, validated fear without reframing, and deferred risk discussions to surgeons.
conclusionsDivergent referral pathways are driven primarily by provider treatment framing and fear management behaviors rather than differences in clinical knowledge. The low-referrer pathway functions as a form of implicit filtering that narrows access along the referral continuum. High-referrer communication strategies represent proactive behaviors that can be integrated into multi-level intervention targets to dismantle communication-driven barriers and advance equitable bariatric surgery access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42498862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.